Impact investing and social impact investing: What’s the difference?
The distinction between social impact investing and impact investing can be subtle but significant. Social impact investors primarily evaluate investments using a ‘theory of change’ model. This measures the ability of an investment to maintain existing social impact or create ‘additionality‘ (additional social benefits).
Impact investors focus on quantitative metrics like the number of people served or the amount of CO2 emissions reduced.
While these metrics are important they do not always capture the qualitative changes in individuals’ lives. Social impact investors emphasise both quantitative and qualitative impacts, demonstrated through detailed case studies that highlight real-world changes.
Social impact investments address a broad range of social issues, from drug and alcohol misuse to dental care, end-of-life care, local community groups, and educational inclusion, among others. This diversity poses a challenge in summarising the breadth of impact, which is why case studies are vital. These often show the ‘materiality’ (deeply rooted social issues) and ‘intentionality’ (deeply rooted intention to create positive social change) of the investments.
Better Society Capital states that social impact investing has significantly risen in the UK, with the sector valued at £9.4bn in 2022. This trend highlights the growing interest in investments that offer financial returns alongside positive social outcomes.
Why clarification is important
Despite the growth of social impact investing, impact investing has grown significantly more. The Impact Investing Institute estimated the UK impact investment market was an estimated £58bn in 2020.