A reader argues that in many ways, Right to Buy has saved the state money it might otherwise have to pay in housing benefits.
Right to Buy’s saving grace
There has been much negative talk in the magazine recently about the Right to Buy scheme and calls to scrap it. Please don’t do that. It has helped so many people out of renting and into their own homes, me included. I moved from a council flat into a housing association on a new estate in the late ’70s.
With rent and other bills to pay and young children there was no money to save for a deposit on a house, so when we heard about the Right to Buy scheme many of us seized the opportunity.
Most of us are still here, but with no rent to pay there is no need to claim additional money from the state. There must be hundreds like me, saving the state thousands of pounds. So the Right to Buy scheme is not wrong, it is the way it is administered that is wrong.
Jenny Smith
Difficult questions
I enjoyed your piece on the Kenmure Street protests but I challenge everyone to think about the difficult questions around immigration. Would we be happy having no immigration control at all so that anyone in the world can decide to settle in the UK? If yes, what does that mean for public services, housing etc? If no, there needs to be some kind of control, as unfair as that feels. I don’t know the background of the men in Kenmure Street and whether the system failed them, but what does ethical immigration control look like?









