Advertisement
Politics

‘Terrible for taxpayers’: Billions wasted on government PPE contracts, spending watchdog warns

PPE worth £8.6bn is yet to be distributed, while a further £2.9bn was spent on PPE items that ‘are not currently suitable for front-line services’

The government wasted billions of taxpayers’ money on PPE contracts for equipment which is either not fit for purpose or still in storage, much of it procured through the “VIP lane” of minister’s contacts,  an investigation by the National Audit Office (NAO) has concluded.

The government spent a total of £7.9 billion on 37.9 billion items of PPE since the start of the pandemic. Around £3.8 billion was spent on contract VIP Lane suppliers – firms that were unlawfully fast tracked after being suggested by government officials, ministers’ offices, MPs and health staff, many of which had links to the Tory party.

However, the speed in which the government acted at the beginning of the pandemic led to mass wastage of PPE and taxpayer’s money.

Jo Maugham, the director of Good Law Project, which brought the legal challenge against the VIP Lane, said the government’s decision to award contracts via the VIP Lane “terrible for taxpayers” and a “a colossal waste of…money”

Maugham said: “It turns out that the Government’s ‘VIP Lane’ for PPE contracts was not just unlawful but was also a colossal waste of taxpayer’s money. 

“More than half of the companies who won contracts through the VIP Lane supplied PPE that is not currently fit for use on the frontline.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It doesn’t take a genius to work out that, although prioritising companies based on their political connections is great for them, it is also likely to be terrible for taxpayers. 

“An honourable government would apologise to the public and promise that this will never happen again.”

A DHSC spokesperson said: “Our priority throughout the pandemic has been saving lives, and we have delivered over 19.1 billion items of PPE to frontline staff to keep them safe.

They added: “Where contracts are in dispute, we are seeking to recover costs from suppliers and we expect to recover significant amounts of taxpayers’ money.”

The NAO investigation found that around 14.1 billion items of PPE are yet to be distributed, while 3.6 billion PPE items in storage are not suitable for front-line services. 

The spending watchdog said the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) is paying millions to store excess items of PPE that are yet to be distributed, worth £8.6 billion in total, despite declaring the country should learn to “live with Covid”. 

The investigation found that, by November 2021, it had cost the government £737million to store PPE, more than half of which was due to not being able to remove items from shipping containers on time.

Strikingly, the government is spending an estimated £7 million a month storing items it does not need, which is around 10 per cent of the total PPE purchased. Around half of these items are estimated to have an expiry date that is less than six months away. 

A further 1.5 billion items have been wasted due to having passed their expiry date for use. The DHSC estimates the cost of these expired items to be £619 million, while the government is still waiting on 5 billion items of PPE to be delivered to the UK.

The NAO said this was due to the difficulty to assess the total demand for PPE at the start of the pandemic.

A spokesperson for the Department for Health and Social Care said: “Having too much PPE was preferable to having too little in the face of an unpredictable and dangerous virus, given this was essential to keep our NHS open and protect as many people as possible.”

More than 3.5 billion items still in storage are not suitable for front-line services, 11 per cent of the total PPE bought by the UK. The investigation found that half the 51 VIP lane suppliers provided some PPE items that are classified as not currently suitable for front-line services.

In January a high court found the government awarded contracts to suppliers in the VIP lane on a “flawed basis”, with evidence that “opportunities were treated as high priority even where there were no objectively justifiable grounds for expediting the offer.”

The DHSC is managing 176 contracts where it believes it may not achieve full value for money, with an estimated £2.7 billion at risk, the NAO said. Some 57 of those were awarded through the VIP lane.

“In around two-thirds of disputed contracts, the primary cause of contractual dispute is the quality of PPE that has been delivered,” the NAO said.

Other disputes relate to PPE not being delivered, payment issues, expired products and missing paperwork. 

The DHSC is working to save on some of these costs and expects to secure £572 million in reduced costs as a result of reducing or cancelling 38 of these contracts. 

In total, 55 per cent of the 31.5 billion PPE items received in the UK were distributed to front-line health and social care staff.

Advertisement

Become a Big Issue member

3.8 million people in the UK live in extreme poverty. Turn your anger into action - become a Big Issue member and give us the power to take poverty to zero.

Recommended for you

Read All
'It could have been from Gordon Brown': Experts weigh in on how radical Labour's budget really is
Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares for the autumn budget 2024
Autumn budget

'It could have been from Gordon Brown': Experts weigh in on how radical Labour's budget really is

'We want a society that works for everyone': These millionaires want Rachel Reeves to tax them more
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been urged to extend rough sleeping funding to help homelessness services
Wealth tax

'We want a society that works for everyone': These millionaires want Rachel Reeves to tax them more

Real change or austerity 2.0? Here's how Labour can deliver a budget that works for everyone
Autumn budget

Real change or austerity 2.0? Here's how Labour can deliver a budget that works for everyone

What Tory leader hopefuls Badenoch and Jenrick think about poverty, benefits, housing and more
Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick
Politics

What Tory leader hopefuls Badenoch and Jenrick think about poverty, benefits, housing and more

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Citroën Ami: the tiny electric vehicle driving change with The Big Issue
4.

Citroën Ami: the tiny electric vehicle driving change with The Big Issue