Advertisement
Opinion

Don’t be greedy. Level the playing field

“There should be a commitment to move 10 per cent from the Premier League’s massive wad, at source, into grassroots sport”

We missed a bit.

Or maybe they did.

Ahead of the last general election, the Labour party had a very good idea. They said that if elected they’d levy a five per cent charge on the TV revenue of the Premier League. That would then be reinvested into grassroots sport.

But that was way back in 2015, when elections were still relatively rare and manifestos didn’t have to be conceived on the back of an envelope on a weekend off.

Last week’s manifesto launches didn’t make quite such clear demands of football’s elite.

Labour scuffed around the issue, talking about fan representation at clubs and holding the league bosses to account over the five per cent. Tories focused on Brexit, which I suppose was a way of committing to take British clubs out of Europe early, something the clubs are already very strong on themselves.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Advertisement

The Premier League earns a staggering amount of money from TV deals. Including overseas rights, they will coin in around £8.5bn over the next three seasons. They bargain for the clubs collectively then distribute amongst them.

The League have argued they already donate a huge amount to grassroots sport. In reaction to Labour they said they already surpass the five per cent suggested. It’s hard to get absolute clarity on that figure. Is it five per cent of the British TV money? Is it an encouragement to clubs to work out how much they give individually?

Whichever way it comes, it’s not enough – nowhere near. There should be a commitment to move 10 per cent from the massive wad, at source, into grassroots sport. It shouldn’t be called a tax – as this may cause some to balk, and also cause problems around overseas payments – rather a future fund. It would mean that over the next three years £850m could be syphoned into areas that REALLY need it. And not just football, though there is a need. All sports.

The money may well be coming from football, but football is all-pervasive. It sucks the oxygen and interest from a host of other sports.

I still find it obscene that wheelchair rugby is getting absolutely no funding ahead of the next Olympics. Nothing. While rowing is getting £32m.

Football is all-pervasive. It sucks the oxygen and interest from a host of other sports

With money from the richest league in the world, wheelchair rugby could get all the funding they need. In fact, they could get more. They could go into communities and offer a chance for people with disabilities to get involved with sport in ways that may be impossible now. You could make this claim for many other sports.

At present, because local authorities value the benefit of sport, limited resources are being moved from other places, places they wrongly see as lesser value. Like libraries. Think how the football money could help spread the burden.

I love Manchester United. I cry when I’m at Old Trafford (pictured) and This is the One, by The Stone Roses, plays just as the team runs out. I romanticise the past, I look for poetry in movement and the joy games bring.

But I’m increasingly uncomfortable with the vast wealth they accrue. I’m aware of the arguments. They’re a business and they’re paying market rates to get the best. But come on – don’t tell me they couldn’t do without a small amount. Don’t tell me Wayne Rooney would flounce out if offered £225,000 rather than £250,000 a week.

This isn’t about charity, or misdirected anger at super-rich footballers. It’s about finding a way to do the right thing to build for years to come.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

Never miss an issue

Take advantage of our special New Year subscription offer. Subscribe from just £9.99 and never miss an issue.

Recommended for you

Read All
Energy bills being more than £1,700 a year is not normal – we need government intervention
Prime minister Keir Starmer, chancellor Rachel Reeves and secretary for energy security and net zero Ed Miliband. Image: Simon Dawson/ No 10 Downing Street/ Flickr
Matt Copeland

Energy bills being more than £1,700 a year is not normal – we need government intervention

I'm gay and a West Ham fan – this is how football has changed for people like me
Jo Bailey

I'm gay and a West Ham fan – this is how football has changed for people like me

How ChatGPT and AI changed the conversation on universal basic income
ChatGPT
Alison Hawdale

How ChatGPT and AI changed the conversation on universal basic income

Amandaland skewers parenting with uncanny accuracy – it should come with a trigger warning
Lucy Sweet

Amandaland skewers parenting with uncanny accuracy – it should come with a trigger warning

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Citroën Ami: the tiny electric vehicle driving change with The Big Issue
4.

Citroën Ami: the tiny electric vehicle driving change with The Big Issue