I got a very sincere letter from people who were worried that if you were homeless then you had nowhere to wash. They suggested showers and baths be reinstalled, the public baths of old, in our cities. At least then the homeless could wash.
Other people I get letters from suggest a cleverer, more deeply spread use of the soup line. And other things, like getting all of the food stuff from supermarkets, out of date stuff, and getting it to people in need.
I never ever get a letter from anyone saying, “How can we end this need? How can we stop the bestial way in which countless stopgaps don’t do more than cover the day?”
I think that is because we are taught how to think not deeply, but sketchily, as if life was some large supermarket, made up of many aisles. And we need to make sure all of our requirements are met in this world of shelves of needs.
Hence when people look at poverty and need, at the destruction of people’s lives on and in the streets, they think, “What can we add to make them clean and less hungry?”, as if life was a long supermarket shelf and all we need to do to make the world honest and true, and equal, is to ensure that we all of us get the shelf of goods and services we need or desire.
Unfortunately our long progress from leaving Africa over 70,000 years ago, and ending up in Croydon, Romford, Paisley, Carmarthen, etc, has not involved us in learning how to think in bigger than ‘relief’ terms when it comes to poverty. We cannot seem to get over this hurdle, which would allow us to imagine what is necessary to dismantle the problem, rather than to make those with the problem more comfortable.