Advertisement
Opinion

Just Stop Oil may be reviled – but their tactics reshaped the climate movement

The disruptive climate activists are ‘hanging up the hi-vis’. Even unpopular groups can have positive and widespread ripple effects, writes Sam Nadel

Just Stop Oil, the infamous climate campaign group, announced last week they were “hanging up the hi-vis“. They called themselves “one of the most successful civil resistance campaigns in recent history”, pointing to the Labour Party’s pledge to end new oil and gas exploration as proof of their impact.

It’s a bold claim. For many, Just Stop Oil will be remembered less for policy wins and more for chaos: blocking motorways, halting sports events and throwing soup at priceless art. Their tactics were condemned by politicians and pundits alike. They were called “eco-zealots” and even compared to terrorists.

The public mostly agreed. A 2023 YouGov poll showed 64% of people disapproved of the group. A significant majority of the British public think disruptive protest tactics hinder activists’ cause. While their approach was clearly unpopular, did it actually work? 

I lead Social Change Lab, a think tank that studies the impact of protest movements – from public opinion to media coverage to policy change. Having conducted a number of studies on Just Stop Oil and other disruptive climate groups, we find the use of such tactics can have some unexpected and surprising consequences.

Let’s start with the backlash. Just Stop Oil, along with Extinction Rebellion and Insulate Britain, were explicitly cited by the last government to justify its sweeping clampdown on protest. Sentences for environmental activists have grown harsher. Last summer, five Just Stop Oil members were given up to five years in prison for participating in a Zoom call planning disruption. This punishment is on a level with sentences for firearms and burglary offences. There were celebratory headlines from the British press, but most people in the UK felt those sentences were too harsh

Yet, Just Stop Oil and their predecessors made important contributions to the climate movement. Radical climate groups helped push the climate crisis to the forefront of public consciousness. In 2019, following a wave of large-scale disruption, UK concern about climate change reached record highs. An academic study found similar results: disruptive action helped strengthen environmental attitudes in the UK.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Advertisement

Environmental protest groups can powerfully influence public discourse. Just as US civil rights activists in the 1960s transformed the national conversation on race – and Black Lives Matter did the same decades later – climate activists have shifted the way we talk about the environment. Analysis of Google Trends shows that terms like “climate emergency” and “climate crisis”, once rarely used, surged by 2,000% in 2019, with clear spikes tied to major acts of civil disobedience.

Another important, though often overlooked impact, has been on the environmental movement itself. In our 2024 Nature paper we found that awareness of a Just Stop Oil protest made people more likely to support Friends of the Earth, a moderate green group. This is known as the “radical flank effect”: when more extreme groups shift the political centre, others seem more reasonable by comparison. People exposed to Just Stop Oil’s actions were also more likely to engage in pro-climate activities like volunteering, donating to charity, or contacting their MP. The message? Even unpopular groups can have positive and widespread ripple effects.

Of course, radical tactics have real costs. Disruption can alienate people. One study found that highly disruptive protests can backfire – undermining not just the group itself, but broader support for the cause. This is the activist’s dilemma: the same tactics that grab attention and apply pressure are the ones most likely to turn people away.

Critics have long asked: Why target ordinary people? Why block commuters or cancel Shakespeare, instead of going after oil companies or parliament? One Just Stop Oil activist put it to us bluntly: “I’ve been told so many fucking times, go to Parliament Square, go to an oil refinery or whatever. I’ve locked myself to an oil tanker for 36 hours. Nothing. I was just at Parliament Square for three days with 60,000 people, nothing happened. But my best friend throws soup on a fucking Van Gogh and we’re in the news for months.”

Our data back this up: the most disruptive and seemingly nonsensical actions – interrupting theatre, vandalising art – typically generate the most media coverage. 

Did Just Stop Oil force Labour’s hand? It’s nearly impossible to draw a straight line between the actions of a single protest group and a policy shift. But their tactics kept climate change in the headlines at a time when it was slipping down the agenda. They did what traditional NGOs and charities often can’t: loudly, controversially and unignorably challenging people not to turn away. It might not have been popular, but real change rarely is.

Sam Nadel is interim director of Social Change Lab, an independent think tank that conducts research on social movements.

Do you have a story to tell or opinions to share about this? Get in touch and tell us moreBig Issue exists to give homeless and marginalised people the opportunity to earn an income. To support our work buy a copy of the magazine or get the app from the App Store or Google Play.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

Never miss an issue

Take advantage of our special subscription offer. Subscribe from just £9.99 and never miss an issue.

Recommended for you

Read All
More and more poor children are missing school since Covid. Here's how to get them back in class
Martin Hodge

More and more poor children are missing school since Covid. Here's how to get them back in class

This theatre company uses Jellycat toys to break barriers for children across the UK
The Noisy Dinosaur production from Toucan Theatre. Image of two cast members with jellycats
James Baldwin

This theatre company uses Jellycat toys to break barriers for children across the UK

People in poverty feel disconnected from democracy. But it doesn't have to be this way
Hannah Paylor

People in poverty feel disconnected from democracy. But it doesn't have to be this way

Social opportunity should take the place of social security 
John Bird

Social opportunity should take the place of social security 

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Citroën Ami: the tiny electric vehicle driving change with The Big Issue
4.

Citroën Ami: the tiny electric vehicle driving change with The Big Issue