With just two weeks to go until the UK’s general election, the discussion of safe routes for people seeking asylum has hardly featured in the political debate.
But it’s clear that the current plan to reduce irregular migration is not working. Despite a raft of recent legislation – all designed with the aim of stopping small boats from arriving at our shores – Channel crossings continue.
Since the government struck the deal to send migrants to Rwanda just over two years ago, some 80,459 people have made the journey to the UK via boat. This is because deterrence policies ignore the reasons why people come here in the first place, and the fact that safe alternatives do not exist for the majority of people.
- ‘I thought I was going to die’: The reality of life on controversial asylum barge Bibby Stockholm
- 50,000 asylum seekers trapped in ‘never-ending limbo’ by Home Office, think tank says
Politicians need to ditch the narrative that deterrence is a solution to irregular migration and instead deliver an effective, well-managed and compassionate system that provides a genuine alternative to channel crossings.
New polling from the International Rescue Committee (IRC), released today for World Refugee Day, suggests that future generations want a more compassionate system too. More than half of 16–44-year-olds (58%) agree that whichever party forms the next UK government should provide more safe ways for people fleeing conflict to seek protection in the UK, with only 13% disagreeing with this sentiment.
So far this year, 13 people have died attempting to cross the Channel – more than the number of people who died throughout the whole of 2023. The majority of people attempting this perilous journey are from Afghanistan – a country experiencing conflict, poverty and the severe restriction on the rights and freedoms of women and girls.