The role of being a prime minister got more difficult with the advent of social media. Once there were few people on the stage giving out instructions, so to speak. But now there are millions. Who the gods wish to destroy they first make mad. Social media may well prove to be the most pernicious invention since Sir Walter Raleigh brought tobacco back from the American colonies.
Lunacy rules OK. Opinions are everywhere and now it seems that unless you take into account the feelings of all expressed on social media you are faulty as a leader. But how can you lead anything if advice and observation comes thick and fast from all quarters? And polls are continuously debilitating on most occasions.
How can you have truth when it is expressed, conflicted, questioned and dismissed so often and so completely? So much emphasis is given to this so-called public opinion. But how can leaders run anything if all they are loaded down with are criticisms and bitter personal comments?
- Are you doomscrolling on TikTok for hours on end? Here’s how to stop the social media brain rot
- ‘We’ve been waiting for this’: Sexually explicit deepfakes ruin lives – a crackdown is long overdue
But that is not the only problem we have to face in 2025. We have to face up to the press in some ways imitating social media as if it were led by this recent innovation. Social media rules OK. And mixed in with the actual news put out by newspapers and TV companies are, as an example, stories of how a man is divorcing his wife because she went on stage and snogged a singer while performing – in Dominica of all places. She was an influencer so obviously of some significance.
So running the economy with this constant barrage of observations, the NHS, or whatever else falls into your remit is made more cumbersome and difficult because you are always having to look over your shoulder as to what your critics are up to.
But alas, sorry to say, this process is over 300 years old. Jonathan Swift undermined the Whig government in the early 18th century when he agitated against their European war run by the Duke of Marlborough, who seemed to get richer with every war that he fought on behalf of Great Britain. Swift questioned the wisdom: did we really need another war that impoverished the country? His pamphlet The Conduct of the Allies caused the government to fall. And the vitriol directed by newspapers and magazines in the early days of a middle-class reading public really did bring about change.