As the budget approaches, pressure is mounting on chancellor Rachel Reeves to introduce a so-called “wealth tax”.
The chancellor reportedly told the budget watchdog – the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) – that she planned on raising income tax earlier this month. It was then reported in the Financial Times that she had decided against raising income tax rates.
Campaigners like Tax Justice UK have urged her to introduce a wealth tax instead. It found that a tax of 2% on assets over £10 million could raise up to £24 billion a year – voiding the need for costly increases to the taxes ordinary working people pay.
Read more:
- Save tens of billions in public money by ending hunger – not slashing benefits, government told
- World will soon see first trillionaires as wealth of billionaires yet again on the rise: ‘Obscene’
- UK’s tax system lets the wealthy off the hook, report finds – and traps Northerners in inequality
Research shows that the combined wealth of the 50 richest families in the UK is more than that of more than 34 million people, more than half the population, and that two-thirds of voters back measures to tax extreme wealth.
Critics, however, warn that a wealth tax could encourage tax avoidance or drive wealthy individuals and businesses to move money or assets abroad – though LSE research has debunked this, finding that taxes aren’t a significant driver in decision-making about migratory decisions amongst the ultra-wealthy. Administrative difficulties, such as accurately valuing complex assets like art, shares, or private businesses, are perhaps a more genuine hurdle.









