Millions of women are being penalised for caring for their children long after they have grown and left home. We already know that women pay a huge penalty for being the primary carer when they start a family, but what is now becoming apparent is that penalty never stops. It follows them right into retirement, as their pension savings take a hit.
Pregnant then Screwed’s ‘Thanks for Your Service’ campaign is lifting the lid on this injustice, highlighting that women, on average, have a 33% smaller pension pot than men. For many, this is because of childcare responsibilities.
Too often, when people don’t have enough saved for their retirement, the blame is placed on the individual for not planning or saving well enough. But the gender pension gap isn’t something mums have created. They’re not bad at saving; they just don’t have any other choice.
Read more:
- We’re Not Buying It: Why thousands of people are threatening to boycott supermarkets for one day
- Andy Burnham: ‘I’m not naive. You can’t say there will be nobody sleeping rough after Christmas’
- Hygiene poverty is the hidden cost-of-living trap. Why we must remove VAT on essentials to address it
They sacrifice their future to look after their children and relatives, because the system doesn’t give them any other option. The current pension framework rewards continuous full-time employment, effectively penalising those who need to reduce their hours or leave work because of caring responsibilities. A recent YouGov survey found that 42% of mums said they had reduced their pension contributions because they had little or no choice due to childcare responsibilities.
Agnes is one of many mums who told us they had been left with no choice but to deprioritise pension savings.









