When is an EU-UK wide youth mobility scheme not an EU-UK wide youth mobility scheme? When the Westminster government says it’s not. Even when it really looks like it is!
As one-liners go this is not exactly a zinger. The Schrödinger’s cat of international movement policy reform is not going to have the crowd calling out for more. Unless Bob Mortimer delivers it. But the change it signifies is welcome. Even if that change is, inexplicably, being denied just now.
The scheme would allow people under 30 to move and work freely between the UK and EU countries for a limited period of time. At present, that period of time looks like being a year. Or it doesn’t. Though it does.
The UK already has similar schemes with a number of nations, including New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan and Uruguay. Which are all quite far away. The EU has the benefit of being closer – comedy and geography for you here. The wider issue is that this is the first major piece of pro-movement legislation between the UK and EU since Brexit.
Of course it’s a positive thing, to allow younger people opportunities to live and work and challenge themselves away from home. The renowned historian Peter Frankopan said recently he felt all young people should be paid to live a year abroad. Which sounds great but does feel a little heavy on the public purse. Also, there might be more take-up for spaces on Frankopan’s paid gap years along the Med than in an industrial town on the Ruhr.
- No, Brexit didn’t help UK ‘take back control’ – it made immigration rise. Here’s how
- Why Europe’s sleeper trains are waking up
- Nigel Farage is like poison – why is he still allowed to set the political agenda?
One of Brexit’s great limitations was the shuttering of opportunity, the limiting of horizons that had previously been wider. You might argue that those opportunities to live and work in the EU, beyond Britain, were middle-class in nature anyway. But that is broad, reductive and incorrect.