This in itself isn’t great, but becomes especially difficult given self-imposed rules Rachel Reeves has given herself. The chancellor’s fiscal rules forbid borrowing for day-to-day spending, which means the government won’t borrow to service its debt.
After her October budget, the Office for Budget Responsibility said Reeves had £9.9bn of headroom to meet her rules. The higher cost of borrowing threatens to gobble this up.
“Rachel Reeves’ fiscal strategy appears to be nothing more than wishful thinking dressed up as policy,” said Nigel Green, CEO of deVere Group, an independent financial consultancy.
Continue reading for free
Registration is free and takes less than 30 seconds.
Our supporters make Big Issue’s work possible. Join us to see the impact we’re having together and discover more ways to help people facing poverty access income, opportunity and support.
“Reeves’ fragile £9.9bn fiscal buffer could be obliterated well before her official fiscal update on 26 March. The chancellor’s inability to reassure markets is fanning fears of an economic implosion, with austerity looming as the only option to restore credibility – a brutal throwback to 1976.”
This presents her with options, says Ravn: Stalling future spending plans, increasing taxes or deviating from the fiscal rules.
Her deputy, Darren Jones, has told parliament that the fiscal rules are non-negotiable. “There should be no doubt about the government’s commitment to economic stability and sound public finances, this is why meeting the fiscal rules is non-negotiable,” Jones told MPs.
Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
How will this impact you?
With the fiscal rules seemingly non-negotiable, the spectre of spending cuts is looming.
“UK households will be impacted through the fiscal policy choices and through the interest rate decisions of the Bank of England,” says Ravn. “The Bank of England has signalled that it is reluctant to cut interest rates fast because inflation now is coming down slower. Thus, it is likely that fiscal policy will need to be tightened.”
Yet the whiff of austerity puts Starmer’s government in a tough position. In the run-up to the election, he told Big Issue there would be no return to austerity under his watch, while much of his policy agenda rests on improving public services.
Ravn adds: “Higher taxes will mean tighter household finances and fewer jobs. Less fiscal spending will worsen public services and reduce job opportunities. Both will work against growth but there might not be much room to do much else for Labour.”
Do you have a story to tell or opinions to share about this? Get in touch and tell us more. This winter, you can make a lasting change on a vendor’s life. Buy a magazine from your local vendor in the street every week. If you can’t reach them, buy a Vendor Support Kit.